Second feedback for Posters.

What statement / fact / question is being communicated to you?

About the lack of safe water.

Is this being communicated in a clear and focused way?  [ Yes ] 

But the text takes too much time to understand and read personally.

Have the posters been kept simple and to the point?, also is this a Fact, Question or statement?  [ Yes ] 

The posters are simple and keep to the point of the quote.

Has the restrictions of the two colours plus stock been met?  [ Yes ]

Are the two colours plus stock appropriate for the solution?  [ Yes ]

Why are the two colours plus stock appropriate/inappropriate?

I really like the colours used and instantly knew it ws water related which is good.

Do the posters work as a set or series?  [ Yes ] 

Why do they work / dont work as a part of a set series and could this be developed further?

They work well as a series. All keep the same colour and all stand out just as much so one doesn't over power the rest.

Is it clearly evident which poster is TYPE, IMAGE and TYPE & IMAGE?

Yes it's clear although the water droplets are becoming borderline image.

Are the posters "memorable, immediate high impact and clear"? 

I feel the images are attractive and clear. But need to be more high impact as the seriousness of the issue isn't clear. I think it needs harsher images to relate to the quote.

Do you feel the brief fulfilled to its full potential ?  [ Unsure ]

There is too much water in the posters sending the message that it's plentiful opposed to in lack of.

I do like the posters a lot and think they are attractive to look at, just the message needs to be clearer.